[os-infrastructure] RE: [os-engineering] Model discussionboileddown

[Durwin Wright]

There is not need for me to send a private response.  I will never agree
to A.

Durwin Wright | Sr. Architect | Durwin.Wright at ingres.com | Ingres | 500
Arguello Street | Suite 200 | Redwood City | CA | 94063 | USA  +1
650-587-5523 | fax: +1 650-587-5550 | "Wag the Dog" 
-----Original Message-----
From: opensource-engineering-bounces at lists.ingres.com
[mailto:opensource-engineering-bounces at lists.ingres.com] On Behalf Of
Andrew Ross
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:24 PM
To: Discussions about the infrastructure needed to support a true
opensourcecommunity
Cc: Open Source Engineering
Subject: RE: [os-infrastructure] RE: [os-engineering] Model
discussionboileddown


Everyone,

For anyone who has a concern with he fresh model that has not been
addressed, please send it to me in private. I'll collate the responses,
post them here in one email, and try to answer them. From my perspective
the concerns posted so far have been misunderstandings rather than real
issues with the model.

Also, it seems to me that the difference between "fresh" and
"controlled" is that controlled creates an addition branch that
community work from/hang off if they create a branch. Bodo, could you
please confirm this is correct?

Andrew
 

-----Original Message-----
From: opensource-infrastructure-bounces at lists.ingres.com
[mailto:opensource-infrastructure-bounces at lists.ingres.com] On Behalf Of
Joe Abbate
Sent: June 25, 2008 3:09 PM
To: Discussions about the infrastructure needed to support a true open
sourcecommunity
Cc: Open Source Engineering
Subject: Re: [os-infrastructure] RE: [os-engineering] Model discussion
boileddown

Hi Daryl,

Daryl Monge wrote:
> I thought the original email WAS the survey.  Private mails between 
> individuals do not help us change/refine/augment our views or
positions.

I meant survey in the sense of reviewing and tallying up the responses.

>From what I saw, you (prior to Bodo's "controlled" option), Alex and
presumably Andrew came out in favor of the "fresh" approach, whereas
Bodo, Jay, possibly Sean, and myself were in favor of the "controlled" 
approach (Sean said he'd vote for "model b" [delayed] but in the context
of defending Bodo's proposal, if I read correctly), and Roger said
"delayed" is "not all that unreasonable".  I don't want to put words in
other people's mouths, but I believe most OpenROAD staff may be on the
"controlled" camp as well.  The private email that I received also
agreed.

Joe
_______________________________________________
opensource-infrastructure mailing list
opensource-infrastructure at lists.ingres.com
http://lists.ingres.com/mailman/listinfo/opensource-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
opensource-engineering mailing list
opensource-engineering at lists.ingres.com
http://lists.ingres.com/mailman/listinfo/opensource-engineering