[os-infrastructure] Accepting (or rejecting) user contributions into piccolo ingres!main and or community branches

[Jay Hankinson]

Yes, it is. Appologies, I meant to check and reference P3 before I sent 
the mail but something distracted me (lunch I think ;-). I'm not sure if 
anyone explicitly said no-direct development in the sync branch, 
although it's implied for it to work.

J
Chris Clark wrote:
> On 7/1/2008 1:52 PM, Jay Hankinson wrote:
>> ....What would make more sense (IMO, and I believe this is also the 
>> essence of what Steve suggested) would be to create a "comdev" branch 
>> from "community main" and mandate that form this point on there is no 
>> direct development in "community main" and that "comdev" becomes the 
>> point for main line community development.
>
> This _sounds_ like  Proposal 3 (replace "community Development" in the 
> gfx with "comdev") at http://community.ingres.com/wiki/Community_Model 
> can you clarify this (or explain any differences)?
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> opensource-infrastructure mailing list
> opensource-infrastructure at lists.ingres.com
> http://lists.ingres.com/mailman/listinfo/opensource-infrastructure