[os-infrastructure] Accepting (or rejecting) user contributions into piccolo ingres!main and or community branches

[Chris Clark]

On 7/1/2008 1:52 PM, Jay Hankinson wrote:
> ....What would make more sense (IMO, and I believe this is also the 
> essence of what Steve suggested) would be to create a "comdev" branch 
> from "community main" and mandate that form this point on there is no 
> direct development in "community main" and that "comdev" becomes the 
> point for main line community development.

This _sounds_ like  Proposal 3 (replace "community Development" in the 
gfx with "comdev") at http://community.ingres.com/wiki/Community_Model 
can you clarify this (or explain any differences)?

Chris